Volume-based low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer–specific mortality (NELSON)

Clinical Question

Does volume-based low-dose computed tomographic screening reduce lung cancer–specific mortality?

Bottom line

The results of this trial are consistent with the results from the National Lung Screening Trial, with a reduction in lung cancer–specific mortality that was clinically and statistically significant. 1b

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (nonblinded)

Funding: Government

Setting: Population-based

Reviewer

Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA


Discuss this POEM


Comments

Joshua Samsoondar

NELSON shows us that screening does not reduce mortality.

I don't understand how no one pays attention to the fact that overall mortality was not improved with screening. In fact, it was slightly, but numerically, worse vs control (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.92-1.11). Of course, NELSON was underpowered to assess overall mortality, but still, that number is trending in the wrong direction.

NELSON shows us that screening clearly reduces death from lung cancer while having no effect whatsoever on death from any cause. When patients are subjected to repeated CT scans, will they be told this? Will clinicians even be aware of this or will they mistakenly believe that they are saving lives?