Volume-based low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer–specific mortality (NELSON)

Question clinique

Does volume-based low-dose computed tomographic screening reduce lung cancer–specific mortality?

L’Essentiel

The results of this trial are consistent with the results from the National Lung Screening Trial, with a reduction in lung cancer–specific mortality that was clinically and statistically significant. 1b

Plan de l'etude: Randomized controlled trial (nonblinded)

Financement: Government

Cadre: Population-based

Reviewer

Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA


Discutez de ce POEM


Commentaires

Joshua Samsoondar

NELSON shows us that screening does not reduce mortality.

I don't understand how no one pays attention to the fact that overall mortality was not improved with screening. In fact, it was slightly, but numerically, worse vs control (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.92-1.11). Of course, NELSON was underpowered to assess overall mortality, but still, that number is trending in the wrong direction.

NELSON shows us that screening clearly reduces death from lung cancer while having no effect whatsoever on death from any cause. When patients are subjected to repeated CT scans, will they be told this? Will clinicians even be aware of this or will they mistakenly believe that they are saving lives?