Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Do helmets reduce serious injury and fatalities among motorcyclists?
Bottom line
In a medical center serving 3 neighboring states, motorcycle crash victims from the 2 states with universal helmet laws (Tennessee and Virginia) had significantly lower rates of death and severe head/neck injuries than the state without such a law (Kentucky). The motorcyclists who died in Kentucky were younger then those in Tennessee and Virginia, and included more women. 2c
Reference
Study design: Cross-sectional
Funding: Unknown/not stated
Setting: Population-based
Synopsis
Many studies regarding mandatory helmet laws for motorcyclists have examined pre-law and post-law data. This study takes advantage of a natural experiment going on at the Tennessee-Virginia-Kentucky border, in which Kentucky is the only state of the 3 without a law mandating helmet use for all motorcycle riders. At a Level I trauma center serving the 3 states, these researchers identified all 729 motorcycle crash victims admitted to the center between mid-2005 and mid-2015. Among the Kentucky motorcyclists, 41% were wearing helmets, compared with 89% in Tennessee and 81% in Virginia. Compared with motorcyclists in the 2 other states, those in Kentucky had a higher in-hospital fatality rate (7.3% vs 4.3%; P < .001), as well as significantly longer lengths of stay, more severe head and neck injuries, and more surgeries. Not surprisingly, unhelmeted status across all 3 states predicted strikingly more severe head injuries and death (adjusted odds ratios 15.3 and 4.2, respectively). Note that this was a cohort of crash victims who survived long enough to be admitted. Unhelmeted heads were likely even more prevalent among those who died at the scene of the crash.
Reviewer
Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA