Extended rivaroxaban prophylaxis following a medical inpatient stay does not provide a net benefit (MARINER)

Clinical Question

Does rivaroxaban for 6 weeks after hospitalization for a medical illness provide more benefit than harm?

Bottom line

Even in a group of patients chosen for being at higher-than-average risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), 6 weeks of rivaroxaban prophylaxis following an inpatient stay did not provide a net benefit 1b

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)

Funding: Industry

Setting: Inpatient (any location) with outpatient follow-up

Reviewer

Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA


Discuss this POEM


Comments

Anonymous

Their is no reference to the dosing as it appears possible sub- therapeutic dosing was used.

Anonymous

I am concerned. The authors conflated illness related events eg vte with treatment related events eg major bleed. There’s no way to tell which one caused mortality. The patient gets treatment costs- mine cost$150CDN- and harms without benefit. I had to go back to ER because of treatment harm from rivaroxaban. It’s a really bad deal for patients

Anonymous

Good poem