Providing procalcitonin levels does not reduce antibiotic use in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Clinical Question

Does access to a procalcitonin-based antibiotic guideline decrease antibiotic exposure in adults who present to the emergency department with a lower respiratory tract infection?

Bottom line

In this study, no difference was seen in antibiotic exposure or adverse events in patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) when comparing a usual care group with a group in which clinicians were provided with procalcitonin levels and a procalcitonin-based antibiotic-prescribing guideline. In both groups, approximately 60% of patients received antibiotics. This suggests that clinicians do not often use procalcitonin data to guide antibiotic decisions when it comes to LRTIs. 1b

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (nonblinded)

Funding: Government

Setting: Emergency department

Reviewer

Nita Shrikant Kulkarni, MD
Assistant Professor in Hospital Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL


Discuss this POEM


Comments

Anonymous

good poem

Anonymous

Not surprising

Another recent study showed patient satisfaction with their physician was most closely correlated with whether they got an antibiotic or not. So is the fact that we are ignoring evidence based data mean we just want to be liked or that we just need more education. Is WIC/urgent care assembly line medicine encouraging ignorance of EBM. It doesn't bode well for antibiotic resistance

Anonymous

Calcitonin and antibiotic prescribing:Just another distinction without a difference

Anonymous

I will request procalcitonin level in patients with LRTI to check the levels before prescribing antibiotics

Anonymous

Modern practice is caught between that proverbial rock and hard place of treat the patient or treat the algorithm.

Anonymous

Excellent

Anonymous

Another lab test of marginal value- "treat the patient and not the lab test"

Anonymous

How do I order procalciton in the community?