Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Does access to a procalcitonin-based antibiotic guideline decrease antibiotic exposure in adults who present to the emergency department with a lower respiratory tract infection?
Bottom line
In this study, no difference was seen in antibiotic exposure or adverse events in patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) when comparing a usual care group with a group in which clinicians were provided with procalcitonin levels and a procalcitonin-based antibiotic-prescribing guideline. In both groups, approximately 60% of patients received antibiotics. This suggests that clinicians do not often use procalcitonin data to guide antibiotic decisions when it comes to LRTIs. 1b
Reference
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (nonblinded)
Funding: Government
Setting: Emergency department
Synopsis
This multicenter trial conducted in the United States included adults with LRTIs for whom the emergency department physician was uncertain whether antibiotic therapy was indicated. investigators randomized the 1664 patients into either a usual care group or a procalcitonin group, in which clinicians were provided with patients' procalcitonin levels and had access to a procalcitonin-based antibiotic prescribing guideline. This guideline states that antibiotics are strongly discouraged for procalcitonin levels of less than 0.1ug/L, discouraged for 0.1 to 0.25 ug/L, recommended for levels of 0.25 to 0.5 ug/L, and strongly recommended for levels greater than 0.5 ug/L. Procalcitonin levels were drawn in the emergency department and, if a patient was hospitalized, they were drawn serially throughout the hospital stay. Final diagnoses for study patients included acute asthma exacerbation (39.3%), acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (31.9%), acute bronchitis (24.2%), and community-acquired pneumonia (19.9%). The initial procalcitonin level was less than 0.1 ug/L in almost 80% of the patients. Despite this, approximately 60% of patients in both groups were exposed to antibiotics at some point during the 30-day period. Overall, no statistically significant difference was detected between the 2 groups in antibiotic exposure and adverse outcomes. In cases of low procalcitonin where antibiotics were still prescribed, the most common reasons were clinician belief that the patient had a bacterial infection or that the patient had an acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation that required antibiotics.
Reviewer
Nita Shrikant Kulkarni, MD
Assistant Professor in Hospital Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL
Comments
good poem
Not surprising
Another recent study showed patient satisfaction with their physician was most closely correlated with whether they got an antibiotic or not. So is the fact that we are ignoring evidence based data mean we just want to be liked or that we just need more education. Is WIC/urgent care assembly line medicine encouraging ignorance of EBM. It doesn't bode well for antibiotic resistance
Calcitonin and antibiotic prescribing:Just another distinction without a difference
I will request procalcitonin level in patients with LRTI to check the levels before prescribing antibiotics
Modern practice is caught between that proverbial rock and hard place of treat the patient or treat the algorithm.
Excellent
Another lab test of marginal value- "treat the patient and not the lab test"
How do I order procalciton in the community?