Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Among primigravid women in labor does a specific nonpharmacological intervention relieve labor pain or shorten labor?
Bottom line
This specific sequence of nonpharmacological interventions—Swiss ball exercises, lumbosacral massage, and a warm shower—applied at specific points during cervical dilatation to primigravid women in spontaneous labor significantly reduced pain, delayed and reduced requests for pharmacological analgesia, and shortened duration of labor. The most marked reduction in labor pain occurred with the use of pelvic motion exercises on a Swiss ball at 4 cm to 5 cm of cervical dilation. The reduction in total duration of labor in the intervention group (72 minutes) did not reach statistical significance, but would be clinically important if validated by a larger study. The approach reported in this study merits further study to confirm the clinical benefits. 1b-
Reference
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (single-blinded)
Funding: Self-funded or unfunded
Setting: Inpatient (ward only)
Synopsis
This was a well-designed single-blinded randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical benefits of a specific series of nonpharmacological interventions on women's perception of labor pain and duration of labor. Primigravid women (N = 80) were included if they had a low-risk pregnancy and intact membranes, and presented in spontaneous labor at 37 or more weeks' gestation. Women were excluded if they had already received pharmacological analgesia. The interventions were applied by 1 of 2 physical therapists. The interventions consisted of pelvic motion exercises on a Swiss ball at 4 cm to 5 cm of cervical dilation, lumbosacral (T10 - S4) massage at 5 cm to 6 cm, and a warm shower at 7 cm or more. Each intervention lasted 40 minutes (or less, if labor progressed to the next stage before the 40 minutes were up). Women assigned to a control group received routine care. Women in both groups were asked to avoid pharmacological analgesics as much as possible. The primary outcome was reduction in pain intensity as measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale, with a difference of at least 13 mm considered clinically meaningful. For the Swiss ball intervention the mean pain reduction was 24 mm (95% CI 15 - 34), the mean pain reduction was 14 mm (4 - 25) for the massage, and the shower reduced the pain by a mean of 17 mm (5 - 29). Requests for analgesic medication were delayed in the intervention group, with requests at a mean of 1.9 cm greater cervical dilatation (1.5 - 2.4). Total duration of labor was a mean 72 minutes shorter in the intervention group (NS), and the expulsive phase was significantly shorter in the intervention group (mean 18 minutes; 5 -30). Of other secondary outcomes respiratory distress was less likely among neonates of the women in the intervention group (absolute risk reduction 0.15;0.03 - 0.29; number needed to treat = 7; 3 - 31).
Reviewer
Linda Speer, MD
Professor and Chair, Department of Family Medicine
University of Toledo
Toledo, OH
Comments
Good poem
The second stage in orimigeavidas lasted an average of 18 minutes.????Hard to believe. Were the patients 16 years old?
72 min reduction in labor isnt statistically significant lol?! Obviously you’ve never been in labor! Classic example of EBM throwing the baby out with the bath water. Otherwise great POEM -thanks for sharing.
This is old knowledge- finally resurfacing.
One of the important parts of it is that there it stops the unhealthy (stress provoking)focus on fetal heart rate monitoring in normal labour
This study does not discuss its evident intervention bias. By excluding patients needing analgesic relief & likely longer labour, the study shows shorter labour. A future review might look at applying these measures to those excluded by this one
My own daughter found non pharmacologic methods totally uselessness