Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Is ultrasound accurate in detecting synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
Bottom line
In this systematic review of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ultrasound was reasonably accurate compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting synovitis in fingers and wrists. The use of MRI as a gold standard is convenient, but problematic. 2a-
Reference
Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)
Funding: Self-funded or unfunded
Setting: Various (meta-analysis)
Synopsis
The presence of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is associated with developing joint destruction, and early intervention improves outcomes. So, these authors systematically searched several databases for studies that evaluated the accuracy of ultrasound compared with MRI for the detection of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Although MRI is a convenient tool, and has become the noninvasive reference standard for many conditions, it is arguably less reliable than tissue-based diagnostic standards. Two authors independently assessed each study for inclusion, then assessed the quality of the included studies and had a "discussion" in the event of disagreements. The authors also graded the quality of the MRIs on the basis of the power of magnet, use of contrast, resolution, and so forth (reinforcing the idea that MRI is a problematic gold standard). Although this study was not funded, 2 of the authors have significant relationships with industry. Ultimately they included 14 studies: 5 studies assessed a total of 275 wrists, 12 stuides assessed more than 2060 metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP), 6 studies assessed 1073 proximal interphalangeal joints (PIP), and 2 studies evaluated 31 knees. Compared with MRI the overall accuracy for ultrasound was slightly better for finger joints than for wrists (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.91 for fingers, 0.81 for wrists) and not very accurate for knees (0.61). When the result was abnormal the ultrasound was pretty reliable, but when the result was normal the ultrasound was only modestly reliable. The positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-, respectively) and 95% confidence intervals for each joint are as follows: Wrist: LR+ 3.3 (0.9 - 14.5), LR- 0.3 (0.1 - 1.1) MCP: LR+ 9.1 (3.6 - 27), LR- 0.3 (0.2 - 0.6) PIP: LR+ 11.8 (1.6 - 31), LR- 0.3 (0.07 - 0.8) Knee: LR+ 2.3 (0.7 - 10), LR- 0.2 (0.01 - 2.2) Just a reminder: A likelihood ratio of 1 provides no useful information; values less than 0.1 or greater than 10 provide the most useful information. The confidence intervals in these studies are wide enough to dampen the authors' conclusions that ultrasound is accurate enough in detecting synovitis in the fingers.
Reviewer
Henry C. Barry, MD, MS
Professor
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI
Comments
bad poem
There is no diagnostic criteria reported. What are we looking for, effusions, cartilage erosions, synovial thickness? I’m not an expert, this info would have made this POEM more useful for me.
good poem
NO USEFUL CLINICAL INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL PATIENT
Excellent
Would like to see a 3rd study group using experienced rheumatologist's examining fingers for early synovitis in those joints
A patient with suspect RA was scheduled for MRI of the wrist was hesitating because of allergy to contrast dye and would require 3 doses of prednisone refused the MRI .She can be directed to have an US.