Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Do high-risk patients taking evolocumab who have acute coronary events have higher cholesterol levels than those who don't have acute coronary events?
Bottom line
In this secondary analysis, patients who are taking evolocumab and don't have cardiac events have lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels than those patients who have cardiac events. This is not the same as treating patients to specific lipid targets. 3b
Reference
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)
Funding: Industry
Setting: Outpatient (any)
Synopsis
This paper is a planned secondary analysis of an industry-sponsored randomized trial that tested a new kind of agent—a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibody called evolocumab (Repatha). The main trial enrolled more than 27,000 patients with stable cardiovascular disease and additional risk factors, and an LDL cholesterol level greater than 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) while taking optimal doses of a statin or ezetimibe (Zetia). The researchers randomized patients to receive evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks or 420 mg once a month according to patient preference) or matching placebo. They followed up for a median of 2 years, measuring a number of markers and assessing clinical outcomes. In the main report of the trial, patients using evolocumab had fewer nonfatal myocardial infarctions but had no benefit in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. (See http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/content/poem/190816.) In this secondary analysis (for which the funder collected and interpreted the data and helped edit the manuscript), the authors aimed to see how the LDL levels at 4 weeks correlated with outcomes and safety. They report data quite comparable with those from the original statin trials—patients who did not have cardiac events had lower average LDLs than those who had events. They also report no safety issues. According to GoodRx.com, evolocumab costs approximately $14,000 per year in the United States; it is about half that price in Canada and the United Kingdom. Let's be clear: This is **not** a trial in which patients are randomized to lipid targets. We have heard this story in the past. Randomized trials of statins were not conducted on the basis of achieving specific lipid targets. Extrapolations beyond the scope of the original research lead to guidelines with LDL targets that are easily measured but that can only be achieved through medication. Now that the statins are largely available as generic medications, the guidelines switched from lipid targets to "fire and forget."
Reviewer
Henry C. Barry, MD, MS
Professor
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI
Comments
god poem
The summary does not tell me the incidence of events in the treatment arm vs the controls or the NNT .
a drug looking for a disease
Well I know to totally ignore this paper. Data gathered and analyzed and written with the help of the industry sponsor of the drug! I am sure no risk of reporting bias there. At least they were upfront about this as opposed to the sugar industry back in the 80s. Appreciate the candidate comments of the reviewer.
I NEED MORE STUDY ON THIS, SO I CAN ANSWER QUESTION BUT I DON,T THINK THIS MEDICATION IS BEIGN USED HERE YET
Previous to this trial of statin-receiving patients, those likely to get an MI have already had theirs. This trial adds further to the current debate around the lack of actual evidence that lowering cholesterol diminishes ones chances to have an MI. While that would be a serious outcome, the risk of dying form all causes while on while taking evolocumab remains unchanged
see above
bad poem
Much like ezetamibi, the endpoint is a number and not a hard endpoint such as death or cv event (this was a socondary endpoint in this trial and it failed to prove benefit)
As comedian Jim Jeffries says, we can all do better
Excellent