Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Do high-efficiency air cleaners prevent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations and improve quality of life in former smokers with moderate to severe COPD?
Bottom line
In this small, well-designed study, the use of an active air cleaner for 6 months was effective in decreasing the rates of moderate exacerbations and rescue medication use in former smokers with moderate to severe COPD. 1b-
Reference
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)
Funding: Government
Setting: Outpatient (any)
Synopsis
These researchers enrolled 116 former smokers with moderate to severe COPD (FEV1/FVC ratio 70% or less, FEV1 less than 80% predicted) and who resided in homes where the indoor air particulate matter exceeded 10 mcg/m3. The authors randomized the participants (unknown if the allocation was concealed) to receive 2 active air cleaners or 2 sham air cleaners. The active cleaners had high-efficiency particulate absolute (HEPA) and carbon filters; the sham cleaners had these filters removed, so the air movement and noises were identical. The researchers evaluated the participants sequentially for 6 months. Using intention-to-treat, after 3 months, the researchers saw no effects. After 6 months, although there was no difference in overall health-related quality of life, the participants using the active air cleaners had statistically significant greater improvement in symptom scores (clinical significance unknown). Although the average number of moderate exacerbations (needing systemic steroids, antibiotics, or urgent health care visits) was 0.4 in the active air cleaner group compared with 1.25 in the sham group (relative risk 0.32; 95% CI 0.12 - 0.91), there was no difference in the rate of exacerbations requiring emergency department visits or hospitalizations. Additionally, the average frequency of the use of rescue medication was lower in the active air cleaner group than in the sham group (1.88 vs 3.51). The participants with the lowest FEV1 at baseline and those spending more time indoors with the air cleaner on more than 80% of the time had the greatest improvements.
Reviewer
Henry C. Barry, MD, MS
Professor
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI
Comments
Purificateurs
Études intéressantes vu que les gens ont l’impression de se sentir mieux mais il faut un impact sur le côté pour pouvoir justifier qu’on commence à le recommander à tous
Hepa filtre for COPD
Interesting review. The findings are of uncertain clinical benefit perhaps related to a smallish sample size. Also the primary outcome measure is not clearly defined so I can't tell if the "significant" differences that were observed resulted simply from unplanned subgroups analyses. Intervention not likely to be of any harm (other than to one's pocket book) though. I think I'll wait for larger trials before specifically recommending this to any one patient though.
copd air filter
benefit
high efficiency air filters
decrease copd exacerbations in smokers