Treating fever does not affect outcomes

Clinical Question

Does treating fever in adults affect mortality, adverse effects, or quality of life?

Bottom line

Treating patients to reduce their symptomatic fever does not affect mortality or serious adverse events and may not affect the patients' quality of life. The physiologic argument can be made that fever is either (1) a boon that puts the immune system in hyperdrive, or (2) a modifiable affliction that might tip the scales for vulnerable and critically ill patients. Neither concept has much empiric support. 1a

Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Funding: Government

Setting: Inpatient (any location)

Reviewer

Allen F. Shaughnessy, PharmD, MMedEd
Professor of Family Medicine
Tufts University
Boston, MA


Discuss this POEM


Comments

Anonymous

Overly Generalized

While in general, avoidance of fever may not be as important clinically, this kind of study doesn’t narrow into certain subgroups well, ie patients with raised ICP/brain injury for whom normothermia is essential to lessen risk of secondary injury.

Anonymous

Treating fever

I still find that giving children antipyretics imprves their quality of life

Anonymous

Antipyretics

Degree of pyrexia should have been defined

Anonymous

Fever management

Don't treat a number, treat a patient

Anonymous

Unlikely to change my management of fever

It's odd how only 1 study out of 42 looked at quality of life. I know I always feel crummy when I have a fever, so I can't imagine NOT taking an antipyretic just because it won't change mortality risk.

Anonymous

RX OF FEVER IN ADULTS

NOT SURE WHETHER IT REDUCES MORTALITY