Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Does a closed-loop system offer benefits over sensor-augmented pump therapy in children aged 1 year to 7 years?
Bottom line
A closed-loop system that automatically adjusts the delivery rate of an insulin pump increases the time in the target glucose range without any other measurable benefits over this short study period. There may be quality of life benefits for parents and children due to less need for "hands-on" decision-making, but there was also one episode of severe hypoglycemia. Ultimately, this seems like an opportunity for shared decision-making. 1b-
Reference
Study design: Cross-over trial (randomized)
Funding: Government
Setting: Outpatient (specialty)
Synopsis
Sensor-augmented pump therapy (SAPT) uses continuous monitoring of blood glucose combined with an insulin pump. A closed-loop system (sometimes called an "artificial pancreas") takes the human out of the loop and uses an algorithm to adjust insulin delivery. These authors identified 74 children, aged 1 year to 7 years, who had type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 6 months and a glycated hemoglobin level of 11.0% or lower. Those 74 children were randomized into 2 groups. The mean age of the children was 5.6 years, the 2 groups were balanced at the beginning of the study, and the analysis was by intention to treat. Group A began with the closed-loop system; Group B began with the SAPT. After 16 weeks, they had a 1- to 4-week washout period before they crossed over to receive the other therapy for 16 weeks. During the closed-loop period, children were more likely to be in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL (71.6% vs 62.9%; P < .001; number needed to treat = 11) and their mean glycated hemoglobin level was a bit lower (6.4% vs 7.0%; P < .001). There was no difference in the time spent with low blood sugar (defined as < 54 mg/dL, < 63 mg/dL, or < 70 mg/dL), no difference in insulin use, and only a very small reduction in the percentage of time spent with a glucose level higher than 300 mg/dL (2.0% vs 3.1%; 95% CI for the difference –1.6% to –0.6%). Overall adverse events were similar, but there was one severe episode of hypoglycemia in the closed-loop group compared with zero in the SAPT group.
Reviewer
Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA
Comments
Confused by synopsis in this POEM
Both the abstract and the actual article state equivalent of "No episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia occurred in either group". The POEM in synopsis states "Overall adverse events were similar, but there was one severe episode of hypoglycemia in the closed-loop group compared with zero in the SAPT group". Not the same -- am i missing something?
newer diabetic tech
early studies