Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
How accurate is point-of-care ultrasonography measurement of jugular venous pressure in predicting elevated central venous pressure?
Bottom line
Using ultrasound to measure JVP height is an accurate and reliable method for predicting elevated central venous pressure but requires training in POCUS. Physical examination estimation of JVP is just as good as ultrasound JVP, if you see it – but even the cardiologists in this study didn’t see it 40% of the time. 1b-
Reference
Study design: Diagnostic test evaluation
Funding: Self-funded or unfunded
Setting: Other
Synopsis
These investigators examined the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) measurement of jugular venous pressure (JVP) height in predicting central venous pressure. A convenience sample of 100 adult patients undergoing right heart catheterization at 2 hospitals within an academic medical center was assembled. Two cardiology fellows trained in POCUS and one cardiology attending board-certified in echocardiography performed all assessments. Traditional visual JVP was obtained, followed by measurement of ultrasound JVP (uJVP) using a handheld POCUS device. A qualitative uJVP was obtained with the patient sitting upright (a positive finding was a distended, noncollapsible internal jugular vein). All patients then underwent right heart catheterization with measurement of right atrial pressure (RAP). Of the 100 patients, 79 were referred for right heart catheterization for heart failure or cardiomyopathy. The mean age of the study cohort was 60 years, two-thirds were men, 41% were obese, and 56% had a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The uJVP predicted elevated RAP (defined as > 10 mmHg) with an area under the curve of 0.84. A uJVP of 8 cm was the optimal threshold for detecting elevated RAP with a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 79%. A positive qualitative uJVP predicted elevated RAP with a sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 95%. Even the traditional estimation of JVP by physical examination correlated well with RAP, with an area under the curve of 0.82. However, JVP by physical examination was less likely to be visualized by the examiners (63% vs 100% for uJVP).
Reviewer
Nita Shrikant Kulkarni, MD
Assistant Professor in Hospital Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL
Comments
usefull chf
also dehydration
Relevance for patient on ward?
I am not convinced that this is relevant for POC management unless one is involved in intensive care.
POCUS to measure JVP
Most interesting observation is that cardiologists were unable to visually find JVP 40% of the time. Seems to to me (way back when I was a medical student/resident) my "staff" supervisors were able to confidently point out JVP on every patient where they looked for it. I guess they were much better at it back then than cardiologists are now. Of course, when they could find the JVP but the rest of us trainees couldn't we confidently said could. LOL!!!
Good POEM
Good POEM
POCUS is easier and quicker than U/S to determine CVP
observers need better training to pick up elevated JVP