Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
In hospitalized patients with difficult venous access or a need for short-term intravenous antibiotics, are midline catheters safer than peripherally inserted central catheters?
Bottom line
When compared with PICCs, midline catheters are associated with a lower risk of bloodstream infection and catheter occlusion but may be associated with a higher day-to-day risk of DVT. 2b
Reference
Study design: Cohort (retrospective)
Funding: Industry
Setting: Inpatient (any location) with outpatient follow-up
Synopsis
Using data collected from a 48-hospital consortium, these investigators identified hospitalized patients who received peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) or midline catheters during a 2-year period for either difficult venous access or the need for short-term intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. A total of 5758 PICCs and 5105 midlines were identified. Most midlines were inserted for difficult access or blood draws; most PICCs were inserted for IV antibiotics. The outcome of interest was a major complication, defined as a composite of symptomatic upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), catheter-related bloodstream infection, or catheter occlusion. Median dwell time was 14 days for PICCs and 6 days for midlines. After adjustment for patient and catheter characteristics, such as Charlson comorbidity score and number of catheter lumens, patients with PICCs were more likely to develop a major complication compared with those who received midlines (odds ratio [OR] 1.99; 95% CI 1.61 - 2.47). When examining individual complications, PICCs were associated with a 2-fold risk of catheter occlusion (OR 2.24; 1.70 - 2.96) and a 4-fold risk of bloodstream infection (OR 4.44; 2.52 - 7.82) compared with midlines. No significant difference was detected in symptomatic DVT or PE between the 2 groups. However, when using a time-to-event model, PICCs were associated with a lower daily risk of DVT (hazard ratio 0.53; 0.38 - 0.74). This may be due to a similar number of thrombosis events despite a shorter catheter dwell time with midlines.
Reviewer
Nita Shrikant Kulkarni, MD
Assistant Professor in Hospital Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL
Comments
PICC vs central catheters
Although it would be difficult to control for what are likely quite different patient populations, this is entirely consistent with my observations in the ED. I see quite a few more patients with PICC problems than central catheter problems. Maybe my hospital uses PICCs far more often to account for my experience but I still found myself nodding my head in agreement as I read the abstract.