Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Does screening persons 65 years and older for atrial fibrillation in the primary care setting improve patient outcomes?
Bottom line
The United States Preventive Services Task Force assigned screening for AF a grade of "I" for insufficient evidence. This study, an important addition to the evidence base, found no benefit to screening for AF in a large, adequately powered trial. The finding of an increased rate of diagnosis in the oldest patients is hypothesis-generating only and requires confirmation. Also, the balance of benefits and harms of anticoagulants for patients 85 and older is generally less favorable than that for younger patients because of competing causes of mortality (ie, dying of something else before having a stroke). 1b-
Reference
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (nonblinded)
Funding: Industry
Setting: Outpatient (primary care)
Synopsis
This study, sponsored by the manufacturers of the direct oral anticoagulant apixaban, randomized 16 primary care clinics to provide either screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) using a single-lead handheld electrocardiograph (KardiaMobile) or usual care. Comparable clinics were paired, and then one clinic from each pair was randomly selected to be in the screening group to increase the comparability of the overall groups; the 2 groups were quite similar in demographics, vital signs, and comorbidities. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. Ultimately, the screening practices included 15,393 persons and the usual care practices comprised 15,322 persons. Patients 65 years and older in the screening group were offered screening at each clinic visit; 72% ultimately underwent screening. After one year, there was no difference between groups in the primary outcome of newly diagnosed AF (1.72% screened, 1.59% unscreened; risk difference [RD] 0.13%; 95% CI -0.16% to 0.42%). Per-protocol and as-treated analyses came to the same conclusion. There was also no difference between groups in the likelihood that a patient received a new prescription for an anticoagulant. The authors did some post hoc data dredging and found that among patients 85 years or older, there was a significantly greater likelihood of being diagnosed with AF in the screened group (5.6% vs 3.8%; RD 1.8%; 0.18% - 3.3%).
Reviewer
Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA
Comments
Screening for AF in the elderly -not cvontributory
Wide Screening with large sample volume ,more than 15000 patients for AF with mobile cardiac recording device clearly helped to conclude that it was not much beneficial
atrial fib monitoring
not recommended
screening for AF
treating pts over 85 may cause more problems
screening for atrial fibrillation
I don't think this study was long enough to really know if there is any benefit to screening people over 65 for atrial fibrillation.