Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Is sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) safe and effective for improving patient-oriented outcomes in adults with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction?
Bottom line
The addition of sacubitril/valsartan to the treatment regimen of adults with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction significantly decreased plasma NT-proBNP levels compared with standard RAS inhibitor treatment or placebo. However, no patient-oriented outcomes were significantly improved, including the 6-minute walk distance, quality-of-life scores, or NYHA class. 1b
Reference
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)
Funding: Industry
Setting: Outpatient (specialty)
Synopsis
These investigators identified adults, 45 years or older, with symptomatic heart failure, elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV, a left ventricular ejection fraction of greater than 40%, and an impaired health-related quality of life as measured by a standard scoring tool. Patients taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) at baseline were required to have a history of hypertension. Eligible participants (N = 2566) were initially assigned to 1 of 3 strata based on medication prescribed by their treating clinician: ACE inhibitor (n = 1066), ARB (n = 1174), or no renin angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor (n = 326). Within each stratum patients randomly received (concealed allocation assignment) either sacubitril/valsartan or the background medication (ie, ACE inhibitor, ARB, or placebo/no RAS inhibitor). Clinicians were instructed to up-titrate within 4 weeks to the maximally tolerated doses. Patients, clinicians, and individuals assessing outcomes remained masked to treatment group assignment. Complete follow-up occurred for more than 99% of patients at 24 weeks. Using intention-to-treat analysis, patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group had a significantly greater reduction in NT-proBNP levels than the combined comparator group (ACE inhibitor, ARB, or placebo/no RAS inhibitor). However, at 24 weeks, no group differences occurred in median change from baseline in the 6-minute walk distance, quality-of-life scores, or improvement in NYHA class. Adverse events, including hypotension, albuminuria, and hyperkalemia, occurred more often in the sacubitril/valsartan group.
Reviewer
David C. Slawson, MD
Professor and Vice Chair of Family Medicine for Education and Scholarship
Atrium Health
Professor of Family Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill
Charlotte, NC
Comments
No improved patient-oriented outcomes with sacubitril/valsar
I have limited experience using sacubitril and find this result reassuring that it has so far not been someting I use a lot of.
Study doesn't go on long enough
Need longer term data than 24 weeks for hospitalizations, death to know if clinically useful
combo of sacrub/valsarten
did not increase tolerance or peformance in CHF pts
Entresto use
this has been the new up and comer in the treatment of heart failure, I am a little concerned that like many other drugs out there there is an improvement in some metabolic marker but there is no improvement in patient outcome data, will keep an eye on this to see if the drug seems to stand the test of time. It is very expensive drug