Trade-offs between short- and long-term outcomes for PCI and CABG in left main coronary artery disease (EXCEL)

Clinical Question

Which treatment strategy—percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting—results in better long-term outcomes for patients with left main coronary artery disease?

Bottom line

There was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI) when comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of left main coronary artery disease. However, all-cause deaths, as well as the need for revascularization, occurred more frequently in the PCI group, especially in the 1-year to 5-year follow-up period. 1b

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (nonblinded)

Funding: Industry

Setting: Outpatient (specialty)

Reviewer

Nita Shrikant Kulkarni, MD
Assistant Professor in Hospital Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL


Discuss this POEM