Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Since injecting other substances into arthritic knees doesn't really help, what about capsaicin?
Bottom line
This study, which used a nonstandard outcome measure, found that a single intra-articular injection of trans-capsaicin was better than placebo in decreasing knee pain at 12 weeks, but only a high dose was effective at 24 weeks. I am not sure I trust the outcome. Stay tuned for studies using standard outcome measures. In the meantime, please stop injecting crap into joints. The data overwhelming support that placebo works just as well. 2b-
Reference
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)
Funding: Industry
Setting: Outpatient (specialty)
Synopsis
We have covered MANY studies of joint injections for patients with arthritic knees (hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroids, ozone, prolotherapy, and so forth) and, at best, steroids provide short-term relief of pain. In this industry-led study, the researchers enrolled patients with radiographically confirmed moderately to severely painful degenerative joint disease of one knee. Pain had to be at least 5 on a 10-point scale in the afflicted knee and no more than 3 in the contralateral knee. The authors randomized the patients to receive intra-articular injections of placebo (n = 70), 0.5 mg trans-capsaicin (n = 34) or 1 mg trans-capsaicin (n = 71). The researchers used the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and recorded pain-while-walking scores for each patient at baseline and for up to 24 weeks after injection. However, rather than compare the difference in the average scores for these measures, the researchers (also stockholders in the company that makes the trans-capsaicin) report the area under the curve for the changes from baseline until 12 weeks as the primary outcome. At clinicaltrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02558439), the authors' stated primary and secondary outcomes were the difference in average pain scores, with no mention of the nonstandard area under the curve. This is very odd, and may be an example of Procrustean data torturing (Mills JL. Data torturing. N Engl J Med 1993;329(16):1196-1199.). Oh, and rather than using 95% confidence levels, they used 90% confidence levels, increasing their chances of finding a statistically significant difference. After all these statistical gymnastics, the authors report that each dose of capsaicin was more effective than placebo, that the higher dose was most effective at 12 weeks, and only the higher dose maintained its effect at 24 weeks. Given the nonstandard assessment, it is unclear of these differences are clinically meaningful. Finally, the injection procedure must have been very painful. The treating physicians could pre-treat the patients with analgesics. They also cooled each knee for 15 minutes, then injected 15 mL of 2% lidocaine followed by another 30 minutes of cooling. After the "therapeutic" injection, they cooled the knee for an additional 30 to 60 minutes. Wow.
Reviewer
Henry C. Barry, MD, MS
Professor
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI
Comments
"Wow."
The final sentence is "Wow." Am I reading this? Nice touch haha.
Ethics
I recognise that this may be slightly oblique, but is there an ethical issue with offering any of these multiple therapies to patients as "proven", at charges to the patient of $1000-plus , ie outside the publicly funded system?
Ethical Issues
There appears to be several ethical issues with this "study": using an intra-articular substance without some justification of its potential benefit, comparison to a placebo when at least comparison to intra-articular steroid would be more appropriate, and possibly others.