Access to POEMs and Essential Evidence Plus will no longer be included in CMA membership as of Dec. 1, 2023.
Clinical Question
Is an early switch to oral antibiotic therapy as effective as a full 6 weeks of intravenous therapy for patients with left-sided endocarditis?
Bottom line
If the patient is clinically stable, and the pathogen and its sensitivities are known, a switch to oral antibiotics after 10 days is as effective as a full 6 weeks of intravenous (IV) antibiotics for left-sided endocarditis. This would have to be implemented in an organized fashion, as patients in this Danish study were seen at least twice weekly in the clinic for evaluation. Also, only 1% of study patients had a history of IV drug use and none had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which is unlikely to be the case in the United States. 1b
Reference
Study design: Randomized controlled trial (single-blinded)
Funding: Foundation
Setting: Inpatient (any location) with outpatient follow-up
Synopsis
Current guidelines recommend at least 6 weeks of IV antibiotic therapy for patients with endocarditis of the left side of the heart. This study identified 400 patients with left-sided endocarditis who had been started on IV antibiotics for culture-proven streptococcus, Enterococcus faecalis, S. aureus, or coagulase-negative staphylococci. All patients were clinically stable and had received at least 10 days of IV antibiotics, and had no sign of abscess or valve abnormality that might require later surgery. Any patient who had undergone surgery was given at least 7 days of IV antibiotics after surgery prior to randomization. They were then randomized to continue to use IV antibiotics in the hospital, or to switch to an oral antibiotic based on the pathogen, sensitivities, and a prespecified protocol. The primary outcome was a composite of death, unplanned cardiac surgery, clinically evident embolic event, or bacteremic relapse, and was ascertained by a trial committee masked to treatment assignment. This was designed as a noninferiority trial, which is appropriate when you are comparing a cheaper, more convenient alternative to the standard of care. The mean age of participants was 67 years, 23% were women, and approximately half had streptococcus as the pathogen. At 6 months, there was no significant difference between groups in the primary outcome (9.0% oral versus 12.1% IV; odds ratio 0.72; 95% CI 0.37 - 1.36). Regarding the individual outcomes there were an identical number of embolic events, relapses, and surgeries between groups; there were 13 deaths in the IV group and 7 in the oral group, but this was not a statistically significant difference. Safety was similar between groups.
Reviewer
Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA
Comments
Wonder what my ID colleagues think about this?
I work in addictions and have many IVDU who struggle to stay in hospital for 6 weeks of antibiotics.
I see this study only had 1% IVDU in it.
Thoughts on applicability to that population?