Modelling study shows less-intense screening is okay for men with low baseline PSA levels

Question clinique

Can prostate-specific antigen–based risk-stratified screening decrease the screening burden without increased harms to men?

L’Essentiel

Using 2 computer models, these researchers found that screening men from age 45 years until age 69 years with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based risk-stratified screening (ie, less frequent screening if the baseline PSA is less than 1.0 ng/mL and no screening if the PSA is less than 1.0 ng/mL at 60 years of age) results in a marked reduction in the burdens of screening and fewer overdiagnoses at the expense of fewer lives saved compared with biennial screening. Recall that the prostate screening trials found no overall mortality improvements and tiny reductions in cancer-specific mortality, so these models definitely need real-world testing. 3b

Plan de l'etude: Other

Financement: Government

Cadre: Population-based

Reviewer

Henry C. Barry, MD, MS
Professor
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI


Discutez de ce POEM


Commentaires

Anonymous

When less screening is better?

"Recall that the prostate screening trials found ... tiny reductions in cancer-specific mortality, so these models definitely need real-world testing"

Alan Kenneth Macklem

psa

< 1.0 is good

Frank Smith

Prostate screening

Very helpful in avoiding unnecessary intervention and all the anxiety that goes with it.
Shocking to see how large the over-treatment figures were.

Anonymous

psa screening

large Scandinavian studies in the past showed very low cancer rates in males > 60 with asa < 1.0
could screen less often or not at all, unless fh of prostate cancer