À compter du 1er décembre 2023, l’accès à POEMs et à Essential Evidence Plus ne fera plus partie des avantages offerts aux membres de l’AMC.
Question clinique
Does third-trimester universal screening for fetal macrosomia result in decreased adverse neonatal outcomes?
L’Essentiel
Third-trimester screening with ultrasound to detect fetal macrosomia is relatively sensitive (~ 70%) to predict neonatal macrosomia. However, an ultrasound diagnosis of macrosomia has not been shown to be a good predictor of shoulder dystocia (~ 22% sensitivity). There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that ultrasound is a good predictor of other adverse neonatal outcomes, such as neonatal hypoglycemia or low Apgar score. Implementation of ultrasound screening in the third trimester to detect fetal macrosomia appears to be ill-advised because of its potential to lead to interventions that may result in iatrogenic harm. 2a-
Référence
Plan de l'etude: Meta-analysis (other)
Financement: Government
Cadre: Various (meta-analysis)
Sommaire
This meta-analysis included 41 diagnostic test studies (including 112,034 patients) in which third-trimester ultrasound was used to predict neonatal macrosomia and neonatal outcomes associated with fetal macrosomia in low-risk or mixed-risk populations of women with singleton pregnancies. The authors included studies that were prospective or retrospective cohorts, with the exception of one randomized controlled trial. Macrosomia was defined as an estimated fetal weight greater than 4000 grams or greater than 90th percentile for gestational age, or an abdominal circumference greater than 36 cm or 90th percentile. The authors excluded studies of high-risk populations (eg, women with gestational diabetes) and any ultrasounds done during labor. They used methodology to calculate summary receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivities, and likelihood ratios. The authors assessed risk from a perspective of near-term pregnancy (~ 36 weeks' gestation). Most studies were unmasked, which the authors assessed to be at high risk for bias. The summary sensitivity for predicting macrosomia was approximately 70%. The summary sensitivity for other meaningful neonatal outcomes could not be established. Studies of shoulder dystocia among infants born to mothers with an ultrasound result that predicted macrosomia showed a summary sensitivity of 22%, which is considered too low for meaningful clinical use. There were insufficient data regarding other adverse outcomes that have been associated with macrosomia, including neonatal intensive care admission, 5-minute Apgar score of less than 5, metabolic acidosis, neonatal hypoglycemia, and neonatal jaundice. The authors concluded that universal ultrasound screening for fetal macrosomia is not advised because of both the unproven benefit and the potential that ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia might lead to interventions that could cause iatrogenic harm.
Reviewer
Linda Speer, MD
Professor and Chair, Department of Family Medicine
University of Toledo
Toledo, OH
Commentaires
For test
For test
Ultrasound for macrosomia
Interesting how things change over time
I remember when this was a big deal, monitoring fetal size and offering early delivery or LSCS for macrosomia.
It’s reassuring that all our intuition based practices are continually examined