À compter du 1er décembre 2023, l’accès à POEMs et à Essential Evidence Plus ne fera plus partie des avantages offerts aux membres de l’AMC.
Question clinique
Does supplemental nocturnal oxygen improve outcomes in patients with COPD who don't qualify for oxygen supplementation based on their daytime oxygen saturation but experience desaturations at night?
L’Essentiel
This trial is limited significantly by the authors' failure to achieve an adequate sample size. But taken together with other studies of nocturnal oxygen, as well as with studies of patients with moderate hypoxemia who do not ordinarily meet the criteria for long-term oxygen therapy, the likelihood of an undetected benefit to supplemental nocturnal oxygen seems small. This expensive therapy should be reserved only for those most likely to benefit. 1b-
Référence
Plan de l'etude: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)
Financement: Government
Cadre: Outpatient (any)
Sommaire
Nocturnal hypoxemia occurs in some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who do not have apnea and do not ordinarily qualify for oxygen therapy on the basis of their daytime desaturations. In the current study, researchers identified 243 Canadian adults with COPD and a FEV1 of less than 70% of predicted, who did not have daytime hypoxemia severe enough to receive oxygen, had an apnea hypopnea index of less than 15 events per hour, and had documented nighttime desaturations with oxygen saturation less than 90% for at least 30% of their time in bed. The patients were randomized to receive home nocturnal oxygen using a concentrator or to ambient air provided by a sham concentrator. Flow was titrated to maintain at least 90% oxygen saturation for at least 90% of the time in bed, up to 4 liters per minute. Groups were balanced at the start of the study, with a mean age of 69 years; 65% of both groups were men. Patients were followed up for at least 3 years. The primary outcome — death from any cause or a requirement for long-term oxygen supplementation due to deterioration at 3 years — was the same between groups (39% for oxygen vs 42% for sham; P = .64), and there was no difference for the individual components of the composite and no difference at 4 years. An important limitation of this trial was that the researchers fell far short of their target enrollment of 600 patients. But they identified 2 other small trials and when they used meta-analysis to add these results to their own, they still found no benefit of noctural oxygen therapy.
Reviewer
Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA
Commentaires
nocturnal O2
This is a common request
small study ?? validity of. results
the study did not achieve power of numbers. Should not have been published, or at best the meta analyses should be the info poem, not just a reference to same
age of subjects
if elderly it would be interesting to look at mental/cognition benefits. It would be a a worthwhile investment if cognition benefits were observed.
oxygen at night for cold
no benefit