À compter du 1er décembre 2023, l’accès à POEMs et à Essential Evidence Plus ne fera plus partie des avantages offerts aux membres de l’AMC.
Question clinique
Should primary care clinicians screen asymptomatic pregnant women for bacterial vaginosis to prevent preterm birth?
L’Essentiel
In this updated 2020 review, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) found adequate evidence that testing can accurately identify bacterial vaginosis (BV) in pregnant women. However, the task force found no evidence of benefit from screening asymptomatic pregnant women who are not at increased risk of preterm birth. Although the likelihood of harm from screening is low, the task force concluded that primary care clinicians should not screen for BV in pregnant women who are not at risk of preterm birth (D recommendation). There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening for BV in pregnant women who are at increased risk for preterm delivery (I statement). These recommendations are consistent with the 2008 USPSTF recommendations. 2c
Référence
Plan de l'etude: Practice guideline
Financement: Government
Cadre: Population-based
Sommaire
In this updated review, the task force found no direct evidence of benefits or harms of screening for BV in asymptomatic pregnant women who are not at increased risk of preterm delivery. The task force also found no association between treatment of BV and a reduced risk of spontaneous delivery before 37 weeks' in similar women. The available evidence for pregnant women at increased risk for preterm delivery is inconclusive. Adverse events from treatment are infrequent and minor, mainly candidiasis. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Family Physicians do not recommend screening asymptomatic pregnant women for BV.
Reviewer
David C. Slawson, MD
Professor and Vice Chair of Family Medicine for Education and Scholarship
Atrium Health
Professor of Family Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill
Charlotte, NC