À compter du 1er décembre 2023, l’accès à POEMs et à Essential Evidence Plus ne fera plus partie des avantages offerts aux membres de l’AMC.
Question clinique
What provides the best balance of benefits and harms following percutaneous coronary intervention and 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy: ticagrelor plus aspirin or ticagrelor alone?
L’Essentiel
Following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and after excluding patients who "failed" DAPT, ticagrelor plus aspirin was associated with significantly more major bleeding than ticagrelor alone in this population at increased risk for bleeding and ischemia. A previous POEM compared ticagrelor plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes, and found slightly fewer ischemic events with DAPT but also a similar increase in major bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage. Most important, another previous POEM found no difference in outcomes between ticagrelor and aspirin after coronary artery bypass grafting. 1b-
Référence
Plan de l'etude: Randomized controlled trial (double-blinded)
Financement: Industry
Cadre: Outpatient (any)
Sommaire
The current standard of care following PCI is DAPT with aspirin and a P2Y12-inhibitor, such as clopidogrel or ticagrelor. However, DAPT is associated with an increased risk of bleeding compared with the use of a single agent. In this study, funded by the manufacturer, 9006 patients who had just undergone placement of at least one drug-eluting stent and who were at an increased risk for ischemia or bleeding were recruited. Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, or who were taking an anticoagulant were excluded. The study participants entered an open-label, active run-in period where they received low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily for 3 months, and were excluded if they were nonadherent or if they experienced a major bleed, an MI, or a stroke. Excluding these patients likely created a bias against DAPT, especially by excluding those who had experienced an ischemic event while taking DAPT (who,in real life, would presumably not be excluded from further DAPT therapy). The remaining 7119 patients were then randomized to receive aspirin or placebo, in addition to continued ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily for 12 months. The groups were balanced at baseline with an average age of 65 years, 29% with previous MI, and 23% women. Analysis was by intention to treat for the primary bleeding and cardiovascular outcomes. A major bleed was defined as one that required a clinical action, such as a diagnostic test, treatment, or hospitalization. At one year, the likelihood of major bleeding was significantly lower in the ticagrelor-only group (4.0% vs 7.1%; P < .001; number needed to treat = 32). There was no significant difference between the groups for any of the cardiovascular outcomes, including the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke (3.9% for both groups).
Reviewer
Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA