À compter du 1er décembre 2023, l’accès à POEMs et à Essential Evidence Plus ne fera plus partie des avantages offerts aux membres de l’AMC.
Question clinique
Is low-intensity warfarin (target INR of 1.8) equally effective compared to standard-intensity warfarin (target INR of 2.5) for preventing VTE after joint arthroplasty?
L’Essentiel
This study found that low-intensity warfarin (target INR of 1.8) did NOT meet the criteria for nonferiority compared to standard-intensity warfarin (target INR of 2.5) in reducing the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip or joint arthroplasty. The study may have been underpowered to detect a truly significant difference in major bleeding events or clinically significant noninferiority. 1b-
Référence
Plan de l'etude: Randomized controlled trial (single-blinded)
Financement: Government
Cadre: Inpatient (any location) with outpatient follow-up
Sommaire
Various guidelines recommend different target INRs of 1.8 vs. 2.5 after elective hip or knee arthroplasty. These investigators identified patients, aged 65 years or older with a life expectancy more than 6 months, planning to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty. Study subjects (n = 1650) randomly received (concealed allocation assignment) warfarin at the time of surgery dosed using standard regimens to a target INR of 1.8 vs 2.5. Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of VTE with 60 days, or death within 30 days of surgery. All asymptomatic patients underwent lower-extremity duplex ultrasound screening for DVT at 1 month. Individuals masked to study group assignment assessed duplex ultrasound images and imaging tests for pulmonary embolisms. Complete follow-up occurred for all but one patient at 90 days. Using intention-to-treat analysis and an absolute difference of 3% or less in VTE (with most events being asymptomatic) as the margin of inferiority, the rate of the primary outcome occurred in 5.1% of the low-intensity group and 3.8% of the standard-intensity group. Although the absolute difference (1.3%) was less than 3%, the higher bound of the 95% CI exceeded 3% (3.05%); thus, not meeting the prespecified criteria for noninferiority. No significant group differences occurred in major bleeding events within 30 days.
Reviewer
David C. Slawson, MD
Professor and Vice Chair of Family Medicine for Education and Scholarship
Atrium Health
Professor of Family Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill
Charlotte, NC