À compter du 1er décembre 2023, l’accès à POEMs et à Essential Evidence Plus ne fera plus partie des avantages offerts aux membres de l’AMC.
Question clinique
In febrile infants younger than 2 months, can urinalysis effectively rule out urinary tract infection?
L’Essentiel
A negative dipstick urinalysis result, meaning no leukocyte esterase or nitrites, correctly excludes urinary tract infection (UTI), defined as at least 50,000 colony-forming units per mL, in 99% to 100% of febrile infants younger than 60 days. Presence of leukocytes, nitrites, or pyuria correctly identifies UTI in 43% of infants. These results are for urine samples obtained by catheter or suprapubic aspiration; clean-catch urine samples in this age group are often contaminated (Pediatrics 2016;138(3):e20160573). 1c
Référence
Plan de l'etude: Cohort (prospective)
Financement: Government
Cadre: Emergency department
Sommaire
The authors enrolled a convenience sample (ie, not every patient) of 4147 febrile infants presenting to 1 of 26 emergency departments in the United States who were younger than 60 days and who had blood and urine cultures as well as a urinalysis on urine obtained via catherization or suprapubic aspiration. A positive urinalysis result was considered to be any leukocyte esterase (even trace), nitrites, or pyuria (> 5 white blood cells per high-power field). The prevalence of UTI (at least 50,000 colony-forming units/mL) was 7%, and only 9.3% of these children had bacteremia. The sensitivity of a positive urinalysis was 94% (95% CI 91% - 97%) and 100% (87% - 100%) in infants with bacteremia. The specificity was similarly high: 91% (90% - 91%). These statistics translate to a positive predictive value of 43% (39% - 47%) and a negative predictive value of 100% (99% - 100%). Using a lower cutoff for UTI of at least 10,000 colony-forming units/mL, the sensitivity dropped to 87% (83% - 90%) but the specificity remained the same (91%). These latter results are similar to those from another study of older children (Am J Emerg Med 2009;27(8):930-932).
Reviewer
Allen F. Shaughnessy, PharmD, MMedEd
Professor of Family Medicine
Tufts University
Boston, MA
Commentaires
Il est encourageant qu’une analyse d’urine élimine la possibilité d’une infection et on peut assumer que cela peut aider à diminuer le spectre de couverture anti-microbial qu’il faut donner.
Good poem
I will anticipate that my paediatric emergency room colleagues will be using this information and will not be searcing for urine cultures in the population when a negative properly obtain urinalysis is available.
I am concerned that suprapubic aspiration was sometimes used to obtain a specimen.