À compter du 1er décembre 2023, l’accès à POEMs et à Essential Evidence Plus ne fera plus partie des avantages offerts aux membres de l’AMC.
Question clinique
Is twice-daily low-dose aspirin noninferior to a low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after an extremity, acetabular, or pelvic fracture?
L’Essentiel
Aspirin is noninferior to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis following inpatient treatment of a fracture. It is, of course, much cheaper, more convenient, and preferred by patients. The challenge will be convincing orthopedic surgeons that, in this case, "less is more." 1b
Référence
Plan de l'etude: Randomized controlled trial (single-blinded)
Financement: Government
Cadre: Inpatient (any location)
Sommaire
This large pragmatic trial included 12,211 adults with an extremity fracture treated operatively, or a pelvic or acetabular fracture treated with or without surgery. The patients were randomized to receive aspirin 81 mg twice daily or low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) 30 mg twice daily. The patients received the assigned medication while in the hospital, and then followed their hospital's postdischarge thromboprophylaxis protocol. Patients with fractures of the hands or feet, who had already received 3 or more doses of thromboprophylaxis, or who were admitted more than 48 hours after the injury were excluded. Those taking an anticoagulant on admission or with a history of venous thromboembolism in the previous 3 months were also excluded. At baseline, the mean age of participants was 45 years, 62% were men, and 20% were Black. The most common site of injury was the lower extremity, with 67% having only a lower extremity fracture. Groups were balanced at the start of the study and analysis was by intention to treat. The primary outcome of 90-day all-cause mortality occurred in 0.78% in the aspirin group and 0.73% in the enoxaparin group (95% CI for the difference -0.27 to 0.38). There was no difference in the likelihood of any pulmonary embolism (1.49% in each group), but there were slightly more deep vein thromboses in the aspirin group (2.51% vs 1.71%; 95% CI for difference 0.28 - 1.31; number needed to treat to harm = 125), though most of the increase was in distal clots. There was also no difference in the rate of bleeding complications, infections, or wound complications.
Reviewer
Mark H. Ebell, MD, MS
Professor
University of Georgia
Athens, GA
Commentaires
Impact assessment
Very good
Low dose aspirin vs LMWH post fracture treatment
Interesting statement by reviewer regarding the challenge in convincing surgeons to change their practice. I think this could be exacerbated by the observation of the "number needed to harm = 125" when using ASA instead of LMWH. One wonders if any surgeon would be will to take this risk.
post fracture dvt
asa bid cheaper,easier
ASA as effective as enoxaparin
Good to know. Much cheaper!